From a 1K to your
2K target
Take your 1K erg time, choose the athlete profile that fits your training history, and get a realistic 2K estimate using the Riegel endurance exponent.
Quick answer
T2K = T1K × 2 × multiplier. Four tiers: ×1.102 Elite/National, ×1.108 Competitive (default), ×1.115 Club/Collegiate, ×1.127 Recreational. Larger multiplier = bigger drop-off from a max 1K to a max 2K = less aerobic capacity.
Reference table by profile
Estimated 2K total at the same 1K time across the four profiles. Use this to gauge how much your tier choice shifts the prediction.
| 1K time | Elite ×1.102 | Competitive ×1.108 | Club ×1.115 | Recreational ×1.127 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2:45.0 | 6:03.7 | 6:05.6 | 6:07.9 | 6:11.9 |
| 3:00.0 | 6:36.7 | 6:38.9 | 6:41.4 | 6:45.7 |
| 3:15.0 | 7:09.8 | 7:12.1 | 7:14.9 | 7:19.5 |
| 3:30.0 | 7:42.8 | 7:45.4 | 7:48.3 | 7:53.3 |
| 3:45.0 | 8:15.9 | 8:18.6 | 8:21.8 | 8:27.1 |
| 4:00.0 | 8:49.0 | 8:51.8 | 8:55.2 | 9:01.0 |
| 4:30.0 | 9:55.1 | 9:58.3 | 10:02.1 | 10:08.6 |
Frequently asked questions
How accurate is a 1K → 2K estimate?
Within ~5–10 seconds for most athletes when the right profile is selected. Athletes with deeper aerobic bases hold pace better than the model assumes for their tier and beat the prediction; power-dominant athletes who haven't developed their aerobic engine usually fall behind it. Pick the profile that fits your training history for the best fit.
What's the math?
Direct multiplier model: 2K time = 1K time × 2 × multiplier. The multiplier reflects how much your average split degrades from a max 1K to a max 2K — bigger multiplier = bigger drop-off = less aerobic capacity. Equivalent to a Riegel endurance exponent k where k = 1 + log₂(multiplier), but the multiplier form is easier to read in the dropdown.
How do I pick the right athlete profile?
Elite / National — senior international team or top D1, 3+ years of high-volume aerobic training, sub-6:00 men / sub-6:50 women 2K. Competitive — strong club / D1 / national-level college athlete. Club / Collegiate — typical collegiate or solid masters competitor. Recreational — fitness-focused or developing junior, 1K is more anaerobic-biased than your 2K race.
Why do non-elite athletes drop more from 1K to 2K?
A 1K piece is heavily anaerobic-lactic — you can hold a power output well above your aerobic ceiling for ~3 minutes. Going to 2K (~6 minutes) requires far more aerobic contribution. Athletes with smaller aerobic engines lose more of their 1K speed when they double the distance, so their multiplier is higher.
Why does the rule "2K = 2 × 1K + 30s" still circulate?
It's a quick mental-math heuristic that lands close to the Competitive tier for typical splits. For a 3:00 1K it gives 6:30; the Competitive multiplier here gives 3:00 × 2 × 1.108 = 6:39 — within a few seconds. The multiplier model handles outliers (very fast or very slow 1K times) more honestly because it scales proportionally instead of adding a flat 30s regardless of pace.
Should I do a 1K test before a 2K test?
Useful as a benchmark, not as a substitute. The 1K is anaerobically biased, so it tells you about top-end power; the 2K is aerobically biased, so it tells you about your engine. Use the 1K → 2K estimate to set a 2K target split, then race the 2K to validate.